İflas Sonrası Silme Talebinin Muhatabı

EDPBI:EE:OSS:D:2025:1793 — EE SA final decision (Article 17 (Right to erasure (‘right to be forgotten’)))

Türkçe özet

Hukuki mesele

Veri sorumlusunun iflas edip tüzel kişiliğinin sona ermesi ve verilerin iflas idaresine devredilmemesi halinde silme hakkı şikayetinin yöneltilebileceği bir veri sorumlusu bulunup bulunmadığı incelenmiştir.

Sonuç

Bavyera Veri Koruma Otoritesi, Estonya Denetim Otoritesinin değerlendirmesini benimseyerek şikayeti reddetmiştir.

İflas eden bir şirkete yöneltilmiş silme talebinin incelenip incelenemeyeceği değerlendirilmiştir. Estonya Denetim Otoritesi, şirketin iflas ederek tüzel kişiliğinin sona erdiğini belirlemiştir. İflas idaresi, şirketin elindeki kişisel verilere erişim kazanmadığını doğrulamıştır. Bavyera Veri Koruma Otoritesi, şikayete konu işleme bakımından veri sorumlusu sayılabilecek bir varlık kalmadığını kabul ederek şikayeti reddetmiştir.

Karar metni

BAYERISCHES LANDESAMT FÜR DATENSCHUTZAUFSICHT
Data Protection Authority of Bavaria for the Private Sector

________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Our reference: LDA-1085.1-6349/24-F
IMI Art. 56: 669863
IMI draft decision: 772187

Controller:

On the basis of the draft decision of the Estonian Data Protection Inspectorate (EDPI) No. 772187, the
Data Protection Authority of Bavaria for the Private Sector (BayLDA) pursuant to Article 60(8) of the GDPR
issues the following

Final Decision:

The complaint is rejected.

Justification:

The complaint was received by the BayLDA on 9 July 2024 and was forwarded via IMI to the EDPI as the
lead data protection supervisory authority for the controller.

In May 2025 the EDPI submitted the draft decision no. 772187 to the concerned supervisory authorities
with the following contents:

Draft decision
Notice of termination of proceedings

1. The Estonian Data Protection Inspectorate (the EDPI) has received a complaint against (hereinaf-
ter: ) from the Bavarian SA via IMI A56 669863. The complainant claimed that had not com-
plied with his request for erasure under article 17 of the GDPR.

2. The EDPI established that according to the national e-business registry has been declared bankrupt.

3. The EDPI sent an inquiry to ´s trustee in bankruptcy to establish whether personal data previously in
possession of had been transferred to the trustee.

4. In the response to the inquiry, the trustee confirmed that they did not gain access to the personal data held by
.

5. Based on the fact that has been declared bankrupt and has ceased to exist as a legal entity and the
fact that no personal data had been handed over to s trustee in bankruptcy, the EDPI has concluded
that there is no entity that could be considered a data controller for the personal data processing referred to in
the complaint.

6. Based on these findings, the EDPI has shared its assessment with the Bavarian SA via IMI A61MA 711987 to
close the proceedings.

7. The EDPI therefore rejects the complaint based on article 60(8) GDPR.

As the concerned supervisory authorities (including BayLDA) did not object to this draft decision, the
BayLDA hereby adopts this draft decision as final decision in accordance with Article 60(8) of the GDPR.

Ansbach, 05.06.2025