In the matter of the General Data Protection Regulation
DPC Complaint Reference:
IMI Reference:
In the matter of a complaint, lodged by with the Commission Nationale de
l'Informatique et des Libertés (France DPA), pursuant to Article 77 of the General Data Protection
Regulation, concerning Microsoft Ireland Operations Limited
Record of Amicable Resolution of the complaint and its consequent withdrawal pursuant to
Section 109(3) of the Data Protection Act, 2018
Further to the requirements of EDPB Guidelines 06/2022 on the practical implementation of
amicable settlements Version 2.0 (adopted on 12 May 2022)
RECORD OF AMICABLE RESOLUTION FOR THE
PURPOSE OF EDPB GUIDELINES 06/2022 ON THE
PRACTICAL IMPLEMENTATION OF AMICABLE
SETTLEMENTS VERSION 2.0
(ADOPTED ON 12 MAY 2022)
Dated the 30th day of August 2024
Data Protection Commission
21 Fitzwilliam Square South
Dublin 2, Ireland
1
Background
1. On 29 November 2022, (“the Data Subject”) lodged a complaint pursuant to
Article 77 of the GDPR with the Commission Nationale de l'Informatique et des Libertés, (“the
Recipient SA”) concerning Microsoft Ireland Operations Limited (“the Respondent”).
2. In circumstances where the Data Protection Commission (“the DPC”) was deemed to be the
competent authority for the purpose of Article 56(1) of the GDPR, the Recipient SA transferred
the complaint to the DPC on 30 May 2023.
The Complaint
3. The details of the complaint were as follows:
a. On 25 November 2022, the Data Subject contacted the Respondent, seeking the
deletion of the auto-complete suggestions that appear on the Bing.com search
engine, prior to a user running a search, when they entered both their name and stage
name into the search engine. The Data Subject stated that the auto-complete
suggestions contained derogatory terms, and it was associating their name with these
terms. As such, the Data Subject sought the suggested prompts’ deletion, in
accordance with Article 17 of the GDPR.
b. On 25 November 2022, the Respondent informed the Data Subject that it could not
take action on the Data Subject’s request, as they had not provided a valid URL to
identify the content in question for possible deletion.
c. As the Data Subject was not satisfied with the response received from the
Respondent, they lodged a complaint with the Recipient SA.
Action taken by the DPC
4. The DPC, pursuant to Section 109(4) of the Data Protection Act, 2018 (“the 2018 Act”), is
required, as a preliminary matter, to assess the likelihood of the parties to the complaint
reaching, within a reasonable time, an amicable resolution of the subject-matter of the
complaint. Where the DPC considers that there is a reasonable likelihood of such an amicable
resolution being concluded between the parties, it is empowered, by Section 109(2) of the
2018 Act, to take such steps as it considers appropriate to arrange or facilitate such an
amicable resolution.
5. Following a preliminary examination of the material referred to it by the Recipient SA, the DPC
considered that there was a reasonable likelihood of the parties concerned reaching, within a
reasonable time, an amicable resolution of the subject matter of the complaint. The DPC’s
experience is that complaints of this nature are particularly suitable for amicable resolution in
circumstances where there is an obvious solution to the dispute, if the respondent is willing
to engage in the process. In this regard, the DPC had regard to:
2
a. The relationship between the Data Subject and Respondent (being, in this case, an
individual consumer and a service provider); and
b. The nature of the complaint (in this case, an unsuccessful attempt by the Data Subject
to exercise their data subject rights).
6. While not relevant to the assessment that the DPC is required to carry out pursuant to Section
109(4) of the 2018 Act, the DPC also had regard to EDPB Guidelines 06/2022 on the practical
implementation of amicable settlements Version 2.0, adopted on 12 May 2022 (“Document
06/2022”), and considered that:
a. the possible conclusion of the complaint by way of amicable resolution would not
hamper the ability of the supervisory authorities to maintain the high level of
protection that the GDPR seeks to create; and that
b. such a conclusion, in this case, would likely carry advantages for the Data Subject,
whose rights under the GDPR would be vindicated swiftly, as well as for the controller,
who would be provided the opportunity to bring its behaviour into compliance with
the GDPR.
Amicable Resolution
7. The DPC engaged with both the Data Subject (via the Recipient SA) and Respondent in relation
to the subject matter of the complaint. In its response to the DPC of 28 May 2024, the
Respondent confirmed that its Operations Team had fulfilled the erasure request of the Data
Subject in full. The Respondent also acknowledged that it had initially identified the Data
Subject’s request as a delisting request, due to the manner in which it was submitted, which
is why it had required a URL from the Data Subject in order to fulfil their request.
8. On foot of this correspondence, the DPC issued a letter outlining the information provided by
the Respondent, querying whether the action taken by the Respondent was sufficient to
amicably resolve their complaint, as the data in question had now been deleted. This letter
was sent to the Recipient SA on 29 May 2024, for onward transmission to the Data Subject.
The Recipient SA thereafter confirmed that it issued the DPC’s letter to the Data Subject on
11 June 2024. This letter requested a response from the Data Subject within a specified
timeframe if they objected to the amicable resolution of their complaint. On 3 July 2024, the
Recipient SA informed the DPC that the Data Subject had provided no further response.
9. On 10 July 2024, and in light of the foregoing, the DPC wrote to the Recipient SA noting that
the DPC considered the complaint to have been amicably resolved and withdrawn in
accordance with section 109(3) of the Act and that it would conclude the case and inform the
Respondent. On 16 July 2024, the Recipient SA confirmed receipt of the DPC’s
correspondence, which had advised that the complaint was deemed withdrawn.
3
10. In circumstances where the subject matter of the complaint has been amicably resolved, in
full, the complaint, by virtue of Section 109(3) of the 2018 Act, is deemed to have been
withdrawn by the Data Subject.
Confirmation of Outcome
11. For the purpose of Document 06/2022, the DPC confirms that:
a. The complaint, in its entirety, has been amicably resolved between the parties
concerned;
b. The agreed resolution is such that the object of the complaint no longer exists; and
c. Having consulted with the supervisory authorities concerned on the information set
out above, as required by Document 06/2022 the DPC has now closed off its file in
this matter.
12. If dissatisfied with the outcome recorded herein, the parties have the right to an effective
remedy by way of an application for judicial review, by the Irish High Court, of the process
applied by the DPC in the context of the within complaint.
Signed for and on behalf of the DPC:
_____________________________
Deputy Commissioner
Data Protection Commission
4