In the matter of the General Data Protection Regulation
DPC Complaint Reference:
IMI Reference:
In the matter of a complaint, lodged by with the Commission
Nationale Informatique & Libertés pursuant to Article 77 of the General Data Protection
Regulation, concerning MTCH Technology Services Limited
Record of Amicable Resolution of the complaint and its consequent withdrawal pursuant to
Section 109(3) of the Data Protection Act, 2018
Further to the requirements of EDPB Guidelines 06/2022 on the practical implementation of
amicable settlements Version 2.0 (adopted on 12 May 2022)
RECORD OF AMICABLE RESOLUTION FOR THE
PURPOSE OF EDPB GUIDELINES 06/2022 ON THE
PRACTICAL IMPLEMENTATION OF AMICABLE
SETTLEMENTS VERSION 2.0
(ADOPTED ON 12 MAY 2022)
Dated the 28th day of October 2022
Data Protection Commission
21 Fitzwilliam Square South
Dublin 2, Ireland
1
Background
1. On 31 March 2022, (“the Data Subject”) lodged a
complaint pursuant to Article 77 GDPR with the Commission Nationale Informatique &
Libertés (“the Recipient SA”) concerning MTCH Technology Services Limited (“the
Respondent”).
2. In circumstances where the Data Protection Commission (“the DPC”) was deemed to be the
competent authority for the purpose of Article 56(1) GDPR, the Recipient SA transferred the
complaint to the DPC on 28 April 2022.
The Complaint
3. The details of the complaint were as follows:
a. The Data Subject’s account was suspended by the Respondent. The Data Subject
subsequently submitted an erasure request to the Respondent under Article 17 GDPR
by letter on 31 March 2022. The Data Subject stated that as no response was received
to this letter, they contacted the Respondent by email on 27 April 2022.
b. The Respondent replied to the Data Subject by email, noting that following a violation
of the Respondent’s Terms of Use, the Respondent had suspended the Data Subject’s
account on 10 March 2021. The Respondent also advised the Data Subject that
following this suspension, certain data would be retained in line with the
Respondent’s retention policies. The Data Subject was dissatisfied with the response
received from the Respondent and believed that the Respondent had not fulfilled
their request for erasure.
c. As the Data Subject was not satisfied with the response received from the Respondent
regarding the concerns raised, the Data Subject lodged a complaint with their
supervisory authority.
Action taken by the DPC
4. The DPC, pursuant to Section 109(4) of the Data Protection Act, 2018 (“the 2018 Act”), is
required, as a preliminary matter, to assess the likelihood of the parties to the complaint
reaching, within a reasonable time, an amicable resolution of the subject-matter of the
complaint. Where the DPC considers that there is a reasonable likelihood of such an amicable
resolution being concluded between the parties, it is empowered, by Section 109(2) of the
2018 Act, to take such steps, as it considers appropriate to arrange or facilitate such an
amicable resolution.
5. Following a preliminary examination of the material referred to it by the Recipient SA, the DPC
considered that there was a reasonable likelihood of the parties concerned reaching, within a
reasonable time, an amicable resolution of the subject matter of the complaint. The DPC’s
experience is that complaints of this nature are particularly suitable for amicable resolution in
2
circumstances where there is an obvious solution to the dispute, if the respondent is willing
to engage in the process. In this regard, the DPC had regard to:
a. The relationship between the Data Subject and Respondent (being, in this case, an
individual consumer and a service provider); and
b. The nature of the complaint (in this case, an unsuccessful attempt by the Data Subject
to exercise their data subject rights).
6. While not relevant to the assessment that the DPC is required to carry out pursuant to Section
109(4) of the 2018 Act, the DPC also had regard to EDPB Guidelines 06/2022 on the practical
implementation of amicable settlements Version 2.0, adopted on 12 May 2022 (“Document
06/2022”), and considered that:
a. the possible conclusion of the complaint by way of amicable resolution would not
hamper the ability of the supervisory authorities to maintain the high level of
protection that the GDPR seeks to create; and that
b. such a conclusion, in this case, would likely carry advantages for the Data Subject,
whose rights under the GDPR would be vindicated swiftly, as well as for the controller,
who would be provided the opportunity to bring its behaviour into compliance with
the GDPR.
Amicable Resolution
7. The DPC engaged with both the Data Subject (via the Recipient SA) and Respondent in relation
to the subject matter of the complaint. Further to that engagement, it was established that
the Respondent had suspended the Data Subject’s account and following this suspension, it
had retained the Data Subject’s personal data. According to the Respondent, the retention of
this data was in line with the Respondent’s data retention policy. Following our engagement,
the Respondent agreed to take the following action:
a. The Respondent agreed to conduct a fresh review of the Data Subject’s
suspension. Following this review, the Respondent chose to lift the suspension.
By lifting the suspension, this action provided the Data Subject with access to their
account and the ability to self-delete the account, should they still wish to do so.
b. The Respondent communicated the outcome of their review to the Data Subject
on 01 June 2022, and informed the DPC of this on 02 June 2022.
8. The DPC’s letter outlining the actions taken by the Respondent as part of the amicable
resolution process issued to the Data Subject on 22 July 2022 via the Recipient SA. On 29 July
2022, the Data Subject replied to this correspondence via their Recipient SA, noting that they
were satisfied with the reply provided by the Respondent and that they considered the matter
resolved and accepted the amicable resolution of their complaint.
3
9. On 05 August 2022 and in light of the foregoing, the DPC wrote to the Recipient SA noting that
the DPC considered the complaint to have been amicably resolved and withdrawn in
accordance with section 109(3) of the Act and that it would conclude the case and inform the
Respondent.
10. In circumstances where the subject matter of the complaint has been amicably resolved, in
full, the complaint, by virtue of Section 109(3) of the 2018 Act, the complaint is deemed to
have been withdrawn by the Data Subject.
Confirmation of Outcome
11. For the purpose of Document 06/2022, the DPC confirms that:
a. The complaint, in its entirety, has been amicably resolved between the parties
concerned;
b. The agreed resolution is such that the object of the complaint no longer exists; and
c. Having consulted with the supervisory authorities concerned on the information set
out above, as required by Document 06/2022 the DPC has now closed off its file in
this matter.
12. If dissatisfied with the outcome recorded herein, the parties have the right to an effective
remedy by way of an application for judicial review, by the Irish High Court, of the process
applied by the DPC in the context of the within complaint.
Signed for and on behalf of the DPC:
_____________________________
Deputy Commissioner
Data Protection Commission
4